Leviathan Wakes, James S. A. Corey

Book 7: Leviathan Wakes

This hefty book appeared mysteriously on my desk at work, my assumption being that it was left there by my boss who is regularly referring me to science fiction books and authors. The back cover, which described it as a bit of a science fiction mystery, hooked me right away. A mystery! In space!!

The story takes place in the future, when humans from Earth have colonized Mars as well as several of the solar system moons, and have established mining stations in the asteroid belt. Humanity has divided itself into factions of Earthers, Martians and Belters, who barely tolerate each other, existing in a cold-war state that threatens to collapse at any moment. The portrayal of life in the Belt, in particular, is beautifully handled, with insightful references to what existence would be like in rotation-generated low-gravity for people who are born and raised there. I loved the way the secondary story of life in the Belt is told, with beautifully in-laid references to everything from hot-bunking, advanced medical treatments, skeletal adaptations, high-g drug therapy and life support management.

The main narrative itself alternates between the story of Jim Holden, a spacecraft captain who makes a grisly and puzzling discovery in the outer reaches of the Belt, and Miller, a washed-up middle-aged detective who is assigned to locate a missing girl for a wealthy inner planets family. The two story lines eventually weave their way together until Holden and Miller find themselves on the same side of an unexpected fight against a common enemy. There is great character development, even of the lesser players, which frankly I would expect from a book of this size that doesn’t introduce a George R. R. Martin-sized cast. (The point is ironic, in the sense that “James S. A. Covey is actually a pseudonym for co-authors Daniel Abraham and Ty Franck, and Franck is, in fact, an assistant to Martin).

Leviathan Wakes is the first book of The Expanse, a 5-book series, however it can stand on it’s own quite well. I will eventually read the remaining books, but I’m grateful there is no cliff-hanger that demands that I do so immediately. The book, or possibly the set of books, has also been made into a TV series which I will be keen to watch, now that I have read the book.

Rating: Buy it. If you are super-keen, you may want to re-read it as you tackle the remaining books in the set.

Posted in Books | Leave a comment

The Sisters Brothers, Patrick deWitt

Book 6 – The Sisters Brothers

The Sisters Brothers is a dark comedy, written in the time and style of a classic western, narrated by Eli Sister, the younger of the two brothers. The brothers hire themselves out as hit-men for a local overlord known as the Commodore and are on their way together to complete a “job”, when Eli begins to question the morality of his life choices. With the help of an eclectic cast of characters along the way, Eli makes the decision to end his killer lifestyle after this final job, much to the chagrin of his brother Charlie, and all that remains is to figure out how to keep from getting killed in the process of resigning his position with the Commodore. A quick read, and a very enjoyable book.

Rating: Borrow it.

Posted in Books | Leave a comment

The Three-Body Problem, Cixin Liu

Book 5: The Three-Body Problem, Cixin Liu

Cixin Liu is a popular, award-winning science fiction author in China. Translated from Chinese by Ken Liu, The Three-Body Problem blends a science fiction story about earth’s first contact with an alien civilization with the historical setting of China’s Cultural Revolution. The translation provides useful footnotes about the pertinent historical points that enhance and direct the narrative of the story, which proves helpful for readers such as myself that lack knowledge of this historical time.

Characters in the book learn about the existence of the alien race through an on-line video game which places the players on an alien world locked in rotational chaos within a 3-sun system, and they move through levels by discovering partial solutions to the classical three-body problem of motion to help predict Stable eras when the video game civilization can survive and develop. Meanwhile, the world’s top scientists are dying in vast numbers, and it is the job of Wang Miao to determine why, and what role the three-body game plays in the events that are taking place.

The book is a rich story, that tackles the issue of whether humanity is capable of working together to solve the global environmental and social problems it has created, or whether we would be better off putting ourselves in the hands of an alien race with unknown intentions.

Rating; Buy it.

Posted in Books | Leave a comment

How to Teach Physics to Your Dog, Chad Orzel

Book 4: How to Teach Physics to Your Dog, Chad Orzel

I loved his second book, How to Teach Relativity to Your Dog, which I actually read first. It took me a while to get used to the extent of conversations Orzel has with Emmy, his dog, in order to teach her both Special and General relativity, I eventually come to enjoy the technique when I realized Emmy asked a lot of the questions that I was asking while reading the author’s narratives.

Somewhat unfortunately, this first book relies much less on questions and commentary from Emmy while explaining much weightier subject matter. In some ways, it worked, because it takes (for me) a certain amount of focussed concentration to even pretend I understand the subjects. On the other hand, it’s possible that additional insightful interruptions from Emmy may have helped with earlier clarifications. In the end, I enjoyed it immensely and found it as understandable as any quantum physics book that I have read (which isn’t saying much. Does anyone actually understand quantum physics??). It did, satisfyingly, provide some new eureka moments, such as the possible concept of time occurring in quantum units(!) and how quantum teleportation works (and how it isn’t teleportation at all, but something more akin to quantum faxing).

It’s hard to say if this book is truly something to be recommended to quantum physics newbies, however, as I read it with a pretty decent lay-person’s understanding of the concepts involved and am far beyond the “what the hell are you even talking about” stage. My impression is that this book would be a challenge for a person with a beginning interest in this area, unlike Orzel’s second book which I found to be remarkably accessible. That said, this is a book I will want to keep and reread.

Rating: Buy it.

Posted in Books, Science | Leave a comment

Something Wicked This Way Comes, Ray Bradbury

Book 3: Something Wicked This Way Comes, Ray Bradbury

I have had this book on my reading list for a long time, just, well, because. I was only peripherally aware of the story line (something about a carnival, bad things happen…). In this book, Ray Bradbury has woven a metaphor-heavy Halloween story and is worth being savoured. It is the story of two 13 year old boys, Will and Jim, alike and yet very different, trying to save their small town from an evil carnival that arrives late one October, and it’s about Will’s relationship with his insecure father who ascertains what is happening in the town and sets out the help them, at the risk of all of their lives.

The writing is brilliant and poetic, and through the use of unusual yet interestingly perfect metaphorical allusions, Ray Bradbury creates a story with incredible visual impact. The descriptions of the Illustrated Man in particular are amazingly vivid and well crafted. It is no wonder this book has served as the inspiration for myriad modern-day horror novels. I would consider this a must-read.

Rating: Buy it.

Posted in Books | Leave a comment

The Flicker Men, by Ted Kosmatka

Book 2: The Flicker Men, by Ted Kosmatka

The Flicker Men is a science-based thriller that is built on the Copenhagen interpretation of Quantum Physics Specifically, the book is based on the (old) theory that particles existing in a superposition of states can be made to “collapse” to a single state upon being measured or observed, and furthermore, that the observer can be shown to require some form of human consciousness to cause the collapse. Given this interpretation, the protagonist, Eric Argus, sets out to determine what, exactly, constitutes “human consciousness” through a serious of experiments. This a course of action ultimately leads him into a dangerous underworld of secret organizations that will go to almost any length to bury the results that his experiments reveal.

While I am not typically a fan of books that play quite so “loose and fancy free” with the underlying science, the book delivers fast-paced suspense and interesting character development, while still keeping at least one foot in the general area of “real” science, and I found it to be worth the read.

Rating: Borrow it. Not a book I am likely to read again.

Posted in Books, Science | Leave a comment

A Year in Books – Ancillary Justice, by Anne Leckie

The challenge: to read a book a week for a year. Honestly, I have been undecided about it (which bodes poorly), however considering I can lock in 18 books, give or take, through book clubs, it seemed cowardly not to go for it. At least to see how long I can go. So, here it is – book reviews of each book I read from Nov 11, 2015 through to Nov 10, 2016. I was very tempted to start the challenge a week early so that I could include The Martian, which I finished on Nov 9, but decided against it. Might as well do this thing right!

Book 1: Ancillary Justice, by Anne Leckie

Winner of the 2014 Hugo Award, this is Anne Leckie’s first full-length novel. It is a fascinating and complex story that features an artificial intelligence known as Breq existing in humanoid form, once part of a Borg-like network of AI ships and ancillary soldiers, but now living as a single entity on a mission of revenge. She encounters a former colleague, Seivarden, who has been recently reanimated after 1000 years in cryogenic statis, and a series of events sees the two come to work together to hunt down common enemy. The book tracks two story lines (three, actually), one following the course of events in the present, and one that describes events of 20 years past that will reveal how Breq came to lose her AI network and what is driving her mission of revenge. The third story provides some cultural back-story along with some of the origin story of the Seivarden character.

Ancillary Justice weaves a fascinating tale of cultures in a world where planetary annexations are the norm, so much so that a very clear code of conduct is followed as entire planets are absorbed into the dominant culture. Details of the assorted worlds and cultures are revealed slowly, such that the reader must carefully piece tidbits together in order to start to understand the interactions of the various worlds.

Most interestingly, the society to which Breq belongs has no language distinctions for gender and in narrating the story, Breq uses feminine pronouns to describe all other characters, even when those characters are from a gender-defined culture and are known to be male. Only when speaking to someone about another (male) character does she use the pronouns “him” or “he”. I was impressed by how this technique affected my perception of the characters in the story. It was consistently surprising to be reminded that Seivarden was “male” when Breq refers to him as “her”.

I enjoyed the book, but admittedly will not jump right in to read the next two books in the trilogy as I would be had the story completely drawn me in. I do plan to read them, however.

Rating: Borrow it.

Posted in Books, Science | Leave a comment

Judgement and Atmospheric Lapse

My GF and I went for a hike the other evening up the Grouse Grind, which is a trail (or more precisely, a staircase comprising a total of 2,830 stairs) that extends 2.9 kilometres almost straight up the face of Grouse Mountain in Vancouver, BC.

The day was nice enough – about 12 degrees C – and we hiked comfortably in shorts and T-shirts, but by the time we got to the top, the temperature had dropped significantly (causing a fairly severe Reynaud’s Syndrome reaction – but that’s another story). Obviously, this got me to thinking just how much we should have expected the temperature to drop.

It turns out that this is quite a complex atmospheric property, but you can, on average, reasonably expect temperatures to drop 6.5 degrees C for every 1000 metres in elevation gain, an effect called atmospheric lapse rate. The decline bottoms out at -56.5 degrees C above 11 km (however since this is about 2 km higher than the peak of Mount Everest, I’ll just disregard it for now).

Back to hike. The Grind, as well call it, has an elevation gain of 853 metres, which would mean I could have anticipated a temperature drop of about 5.5 degrees C. However, this doesn’t tell the whole story. The base of the mountain, where the hike begins, is another 274 metres above sea level, and since Vancouver sits for the most part level with the sea, the base of the hike also needs to be taken into account. 274 metres accounts for another 1.8 degrees, for a total drop of 7.3 degrees. And that puts the mountaintop estimated temperature at about 4.7 degrees (12 -7.3).

Not exactly Mount Everest conditions, but certainly colder than we were prepared for!

For future hikes, the key ratio is 6.5 degrees C for every 1000 m.

Posted in Science | Leave a comment

The Logic of Bertrand Russell

I have decided, in a concerted effort to break into actually writing blog entries, to start by posting somewhat randomly about the day to day things that strike me as interesting or worth contemplating. My hope is that the randomness will level out somewhat once I settle into a style of some kind, both in writing and in purpose. Today, day 1, I find myself reflecting on the book Why I am not a Christian (Bertrand Russell). This is the current selection of my small but slightly eclectic book club, which is why I am taking a break from a very compelling George R. R. Martin story to read it now. My interest was piqued on page 6 where he briefly discusses the First Cause argument for the existence of (and belief in) a God, which is, simply put, the argument that if you ask the question “where did we come from” back far enough in time, the question becomes unanswerable by today’s knowledge of science and at this point you can attribute the cause of our existence to God. Russell makes a short but eloquent case for why this argument is fallacious, which I won’t spoil for you. What struck me about this, his first “case” for his lack of belief, was also one of my own first bits of inconsistency in god-existence arguments that set me on my own path towards atheism. It was always bothersome to me that the end of this chain of questioning was “well, then, God must have done it” because it either 1) contradicts the point of the argument in the first place. Because you are using the fact that things need a “creator” to exist, then naming god as the creator requires that god then have a creator, because that is the nature of the argument that was initiated in the first place. This line of questioning then becomes an infinite regression (check this?) and no longer suffices to “prove” the point. 2) ends the argument with an “unquestionable” conclusion, which is typically exemplified by the answer “nobody created god, he always existed” to the question referenced above. This was always a cheap way out in my opinion and unforgivably reverts to the “thou shalt not question” method of “proof”. There is no point in arguing the existence of God on this basis, as it is designed to reject questioning. At any rate, I am happy to report that, 6 pages in, the book is pleasing me with it’s logic and lack of pandering and apologies. Nice, Mr. Russell!

Posted in Books | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The Unsung Women of Science

I just don’t know how xkcd does it. Sadly, this is just the tip of the iceberg.

http://xkcd.com/896/

Posted in Science | Leave a comment